Essay on was the atomic bomb dropped on hiroshima justified were the americans justified in dropping the atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki in august 1945 the dropping of the atomic bomb on nagasaki and hiroshima in 1945 by the americans is a very controversial issue with no definite answer. Use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified essay 1137 words | 5 pages use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified the use of the atomic bomb against japan was completely justified in both cause and impact an intense weapon was necessary to force a quick japanese surrender. The debate over the atomic bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki concerns the ethical, legal, and military controversies surrounding the atomic bombings of hiroshima and nagasaki on 6 august and 9 august 1945 at the close of world war ii (1939-45. The bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was not justified thousands of innocent people died from either the bomb's blast or the after effects even today, some people still suffer from radiation sickness america's decision of using an atomic bomb on japan was not only a war crime, but a crime against humanity itself.
Essay on the dropping of atomic bomb on japan on august 6, 1945, a b-29 bomber named enola gay dropped an atomic bomb, on hiroshima, japan hiroshima had been almost eradicated with an estimated 70 - 80 thousand people killed three days later, a second, more powerful bomb was dropped on the. Following the bombing of nagasaki, japan quickly surrendered, virtually ending world war ii it has been often believed that the use of the bomb caused japan to surrender however, not all historians, scholars and military men agree that it was justified or necessary to use this weapon of war. Was the united states justified in dropping the atomic bomb on japan on august 6, 1945, the united states became the first country to ever use the atomic bomb in warfare on this day, the first of the two atomic bombs were dropped the first was known as little boy and was dropped on the city of hiroshima. On august 6th, 1945, the atomic bomb was first unlatched from a bomber above the city of hiroshima, reducing the city to rubble three days later, the next bomb was dropped on nagasaki, marking the quick yet gruesome end of wwii.
The atomic bombing was indiscriminate killing, but that boundary was crossed with the tokyo firebombing, and at dresden, and earlier when japan bombed chongqing in china. Was the atomic bombing of japan in 1945 justifiable it is becoming commonplace on remembrance or veterans' day, 11 th of november, for peace activists (and others with political or ideological agenda) to write to newspapers demanding that americans, british and australians also remember the civilian victims of alleged british and american atrocities in ww ii. The atomic bomb: hiroshima and nagasaki the bombings on august 6, 1945, after 44 months of increasingly brutal fighting in the pacific, an american b-29 bomber loaded with a devastating new weapon appeared in the sky over hiroshima, japan. The use of the atomic bomb against japan was completely justified in both cause and impact an intense weapon was necessary to force a quick japanese surrender the bomb saved thousands upon thousands of american and japanese lives that would have been lost if the war continued or an invasion occurred. In her essay bombing civilians from the twentieth to the the justification in world war ii, as in korea, vietnam, gulf war i, nbsp was the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki justified of hiroshima and nagasaki were justified.
The united state's ultimate decision to release the atomic bombs on japan was definitely justified as they were thinking of the better result in other words, what result had the least damage and least cost. On august 6, 1945, the united states of america dropped an atomic bomb on hiroshima, japan for decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing for decades, there have been feuds relating to the justification of the bombing. Atomic bombing of hiroshima essay 6, 1945, the united states shocked the world by dropping an atomic bomb over the city of hiroshima, japan (wwwgroliercom) hiroshima was a major industrial city with an estimated population of almost 400,000 people. The bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was not only justified, it was legal and unassailable under the war crimes laws of the era the hague regulations on land warfare of 1907 state that the attack or bombardment, by whatever means, of towns, villages, dwellings, or buildings which are undefended is prohibited. The nuclear attacks on japan were justified in an effort to win the war with the fewest casualties possible some believe that because japanese soldiers were known for their vicious fighting styles, the invasion of japan would have led to american casualties in the hundreds of thousands or maybe even millions (o'connor, 2010.
The atomic bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki was completely unjustified the use of atomic bombs was totally unecessary, inhumane, and irresponsible the impact of conventional bombing of japan, aswell as the impact of the a-bombs themselves on hiroshima and nagasaki show how most invalid the decision to drop the bombs was. When japan surrendered after the bombings, the need to invade and take japan by force ended this argument is no longer valid, if it ever was documents written by high-ranking japanese military and political leaders in early august 1945 convincingly show that the bombing of hiroshima and nagasaki, and the previous carpet bombing of 66 other. Use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified essay - use of the atomic bomb against japan was justified the use of the atomic bomb against japan was completely justified in both cause and impact.
Bombing was justified it is widely believed that the bombing was brutal and cruel however, it was the reason that ended world war 2, and if america did not drop the bomb, the losses of soldiers would be even at a larger number than the amount of people who died in the drop of the bomb. In this essay the bombing of japan by the us will be analysed and justified in my personal opinion the bombs dropped in hiroshima and nagasaki on august 9th 1945 and august 8th 1945 was completely necessary. Atomic bomb essay - atomic bombing of hiroshima on the quiet morning of august 6, 1945, the united states shocked the world by dropping an atomic bomb over the city of hiroshima, japan (wwwgroliercom) hiroshima was a major industrial city with an estimated population of almost 400,000 people. The allies were justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki i agree with the statement as the bombing was the most viable way to force the japanese to surrender the allied offer of the potsdam conference on july 26, 1945 stipulated that the war would end only when the japanese surrendered and gave up emperor hirohito.
The nuclear bomb drop on japan was justified if you consider what the japanese did to asia and what it would have taken them to withdraw from rest of asia unlike the germans who have accepted the holocaust now, the japanese don't even apologize and still celebrate their war criminals. Was the us justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki was the us justified in dropping atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasakithe decision by the united states to drop atomic bombs on hiroshima and nagasaki at the end of world war ii remains one of the most controversial topics in japanese and american history. The us was definitely justified in dropping the atomic bomb, because japan killed a lot of people in the attack on pearl harbor i think that was totally uncalled for for them to bomb us they learned their lesson in fighting us and they learned for future reference not to attack us or fight with us again. The decision to drop the bomb on japan was justified because of previous transgressions, political deception, and for the simple fact that dropping the bomb cost less lives than a full scale invasion.